4.7 Article

Development and Validation of an Indirect Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Screening of Tylosin and Tilmicosin in Muscle, Liver, Milk, Honey and Eggs

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf2037449

关键词

tylosin; tilmicosin; monoclonal antibody; indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; muscle; liver; honey; egg; milk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incorrect use of tylosin and tilmicosin could result in allergy and select resistance. To monitor the illegal use of these antibiotics M animals, a monoclonal-based indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) has been established. Several haptens were synthesized and conjugated to carrier protein. Female Balb/c mice were inoculated with the four different conjugates to produce monoclonal antibodies according to the schemes of immunization. Aftercell fusion and culture several times, nine hybridoma cell lines were isolated. Only one, 3C4 that has isotype IgG2a, was selected for detailed study. The cross-reactivity of the monoclonal antibody 3C4 to tylosin and tilmicosin was 100% and 51% respectively. The standard curves based on the tylosin and tilmicosin matrix calibration ranged from 2.5 to 40 mu g L-1 with an IC50 value of 6.1 mu g L-1 and 12.1 mu g L-1, respectively. The limits of detection of the ic-ELISA ranged from 5.1 mu g kg(-1) to 13.8 mu g kg(-1) in edible animal tissues. The recoveries were 74.1% to 120.7% with less than 18.6% of the coefficient of variation when tylosin and tilmicosin were spiked in various biological matrices with the concentrations of 25.0-200.0 mu g kg(-1). Good correlations between the results of the ic-ELISA and high performance liquid chromatography were observed in the incurred tissues. These results suggest that the ic-ELISA is a sensitive, accurate and low-cost method that would be a useful tool for the screening of the residues of tylosin and tilmicosin in muscle, liver, milk, honey and eggs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据