4.7 Article

Enzymes and Inhibitors in Neonicotinoid Insecticide Metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 4861-4866

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf900250f

关键词

Aldehyde oxidase; clothianidin; CYP450; glucuronide; imidacloprid; methylation; neonicotinoid insecticide; thiacloprid; thiamethoxam

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [973, 2006CB102003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC30771426]
  3. Program for China New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0113]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. University of California Toxic Substances Research and Teaching Fellowship
  6. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health [R01 ES08424]
  7. University of California
  8. Berkeley
  9. William Muriece Hoskins Chair in Chemical and Molecular Entomology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonicotinoid insecticide metabolism involves considerable substrate specificity and regioselectivity of the relevant CYP450, aldehyde oxidase, and phase II enzymes. Human CYP450 recombinant enzymes carry out the following conversions: CYP3A4, 2C19, and 2B6 for thiamethoxam (TMX) to clothianidin (CLO); 3A4, 2C19, and 2A6 for CLO to desmethyl-CLO; 2C19 for TMX to desmethyl-TMX. Human liver aldehyde oxidase reduces the nitro substituent of CLO to nitroso much more rapidly than it does that of TMX. Imidacloprid (IMI), CLO, and several of their metabolites do not give detectable N-glucuronides but 5-hydroxy-IMI, 4,5-diol-IMI, and 4-hydroxythiacloprid are converted to O-glucuronides in vitro with mouse liver microsomes and UDP-glucuronic acid or in vivo in mice. Mouse liver cytosol with S-adenosylmethionine converts desmethyl-CLO to CLO but not desmethyl-TMX to TMX. Two organophosphorus CYP450 inhibitors partially block IMI, thiacloprid, and CLO metabolism in vivo in mice, elevating brain and liver levels of the parent compounds while reducing amounts of the hydroxylated metabolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据