4.7 Article

Comparison of sleep/wake parameters for self-monitoring bipolar disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 170-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.014

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Sleep; Prodromes

资金

  1. local university funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Psychosocial interventions may teach patients with bipolar disorder to successfully detect warning signs of relapse. These interventions often include ongoing self-monitoring of sleep. We previously reported that a change in sleep duration (sleep plus bedrest) of >3 h may indicate that a mood change is imminent. This analysis further investigated whether sleep duration, sleep onset or sleep offset was the Most useful sleep/wake parameter to monitor for an oncoming mood change. Methods: 101 adult outpatients receiving treatment as usual recorded mood, sleep and medications every day on a home computer for a mean of 265 +/- 103 days. A daily time series of mood, sleep duration (sleep plus bedrest), sleep onset and sleep offset was constructed for each patient. After applying an ARIMA (0,1,1) filter, a cross correlation function was used to analyze the temporal relationship between the residuals for lags of +/- 7 days. Results: Less frequent significant correlations were found between a change in either sleep onset or sleep offset and mood, than between sleep duration and mood. Patients with a significant correlation between sleep duration and mood included 86% of those with a significant correlation between sleep onset or sleep offset and mood. Mean sleep duration when euthymic was long (>= 8 h in 89% of patients, >= 9 h in 51% of patients). Limitations: Self-reported data, naturalistic study, and computer access required. Conclusions: Self-monitoring of sleep duration is recommended for patients with bipolar disorder. Better understanding of the long sleep duration of euthymic patients is required. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据