4.7 Article

IFN-gamma mediated pathways in patients with fatigue and chronic active Epstein Barr virus-infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 108, 期 1-2, 页码 171-176

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.09.005

关键词

EBV; fatigue; interferon-gamma; tryptophan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic active Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-infection is characterized by mononucleosis like symptoms including fatigue, lymphadenopathy and/or hepatosplenomegaly and serologic evidence for ongoing EBV replication. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) triggers several antiviral mechanisms in target cells including the induction of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which degrades the essential amino acid tryptophan to kynurenine. Because tryptophan is a precursor of the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin), tryptophan depletion by IDO can cause mood disturbances in patients with chronic immune activation. Methods: This study investigated the tryptophan metabolism in 20 patients with chronic active EBV-infection, who were followed up for 4 to 8 months and in 10 healthy age-matched controls. The clinical suspicion of chronic active EBV infection was verified by the presence of circulating antibodies against EBV early antigen (EA) and virus capsid antigen (VCA). Results: Patients with detectable EBV-DNA had higher serum neopterin (p<0.01) and lower tryptophan concentrations (P=0.01) than EBV-DNA negative patients. Serum concentrations of neopterin, indicating Th-1 mediated immune activation via IFN-gamma, were positively correlated to enhanced tryptophan degradation (rs=0.650, p<0.001) in patients, but not in healthy individuals. Patients suffering from more severe symptoms (as assessed by questionnaires) tended to have aggravated tryptophan degradation. Conclusion: Our data show that EBV viremia is associated with cell-mediated immume activation and increased tryptophan degradation, which may partly account for the symptoms found in this disorder. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据