4.4 Article

The importance of defining the geographic distribution of species for conservation: The case of the Bearded Wood-Partridge

期刊

JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 10-17

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.07.002

关键词

Average propinquity; Cartographic; Conservation; Dendrortyx barbatus; Distribution area; Ecological niche modeling; Free hand; Minimum convex polygon

资金

  1. Universidad Autonoma de Tlaxcala
  2. Instituto de Ecologia, A.C.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delimitation of the distribution areas of species has fundamental implications for the understanding of biodiversity and for decision-making in conservation. This is illustrated by the case of the Bearded Wood-Partridge (Dendrortyx barbatus), which is endemic to Mexico and was classified as threatened by the IUCN. Recently the discovery of this species in new locations caused an increase in the known distribution area whereupon it was reclassified in a lower risk category. In our study, delimitation and comparison of the Bearded Wood-Partridge distribution area is carried out utilising five different methods: minimum convex polygon; areographic; cartographic; ecological niche modeling; and, free hand. A number of locality records are also used to demonstrate the chronological order of appearance. The results show that the size and shape of the distribution area of this species vary depending on the number of records and on their spatial and environmental location, as well as on the particular delimitation method used. However, ecological niche modeling provides the best results in terms of spatial and numerical sensitivity as well as lower values of omission and a moderate extent of predicted areas. We suggest that decisions related to species conservation (categories of risk, areas of endemism, etc.), particularly those species of high geographical restriction, should be contingent on the formalised delimitation of distribution areas based on ecological niche modeling methods. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据