3.8 Review

Pathophysiology of post-operative cognitive dysfunction: current hypotheses

期刊

JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE
卷 145, 期 4, 页码 323-330

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-7697(08)74310-2

关键词

forecast; cognitive function; old subject

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) has been reported after a variety of surgical procedures. POCD is associated with a decline in performance of activities of daily living of elderly patients and can cause substantial damage to family and/or to social support systems. The incidence of POCD in the first week after surgery is 23% in patients between 60 and 69 years of age and 29% in patients older than 70. Cognitive dysfunction was still present in 14% of patients over 70 at three month after surgery. The risk of POCD increases with age, and the type of surgery is also important since there is very low incidence of POCD after minor surgery. For many years, it has been known that general anaesthesia is associated with persistent changes in gene expression in the brain for at least 72 hours. These observed modifications suggest an interesting hypothesis to explain the side effects of anaesthetic agents on cognitive dysfunction, particularly in the elderly. The inflammatory response to surgery is consistent with the hypothesis that inflammation contributes to cognitive decline in the elderly. Most of the drugs administered during anaesthesia interact with the cerebral cholinergic system, which seems to be impaired with ageing. One can hypothesize that this cholinergic dysfunction is a potent factor in the pathogenesis of POCD. These findings have implications for the information provided before obtaining consent from elderly patients prior to surgery; a careful evaluation of mental status is mandatory for all elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Perioperative physicians should be familiar with the prevention, diagnosis, and management of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据