4.4 Article

Evaluation of Submonthly Precipitation Forecast Skill from Global Ensemble Prediction Systems

期刊

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
卷 143, 期 7, 页码 2871-2889

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00277.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Agency for International Development [AID-OAA-A-11-00011]
  2. U.S. Office of Naval Research (MURI) [N00014-12-1-0911]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction skill of precipitation at submonthly time scales during the boreal summer season is investigated based on hindcasts from three global ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). The results, analyzed for lead times up to 4 weeks, indicate encouraging correlation skill over some regions, particularly over the Maritime Continent and the equatorial Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The hindcasts from all three models correspond to high prediction skill over the first week compared to the following three weeks. The ECMWF forecast system tends to yield higher prediction skill than the other two systems, in terms of both correlation and mean squared skill score. However, all three systems are found to exhibit large conditional biases in the tropics, highlighted using the mean squared skill score. The sources of submonthly predictability are examined in the ECMWF hindcasts over the Maritime Continent in three typical years of contrasting ENSO phase, with a focus on the combined impact of the intraseasonal MJO and interannual ENSO. Rainfall variations over Borneo in the ENSO-neutral year are found to correspond well with the dominant MJO phase. The contribution of ENSO becomes substantial in the two ENSO years, but the MJO impact can become dominant when the MJO occurs in phases 2-3 during El Nino or in phases 5-6 during the La Nina year. These results support the concept that windows of opportunity of high forecast skill exist as a function of ENSO and the MJO in certain locations and seasons, which may lead to subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts of substantial societal value in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据