4.6 Article

Treatment of Complex Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease With a New Self-Expanding Interwoven Nitinol Stent 12-Month Results of the Leipzig SUPERA Popliteal Artery Stent Registry

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 65-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.011

关键词

nitinol stent; peripheral artery disease; popliteal artery disease; popliteal artery stenting; stent fracture

资金

  1. IDEV Technologies Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives We examined the efficacy and durability of a new interwoven self-expanding nitinol stent system in the treatment of complex popliteal artery lesions in unselected patients. Background The optimal endovascular treatment strategy for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease is not known. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data gathered in 101 consecutive patients presenting with atherosclerotic, popliteal arterial disease, who underwent implantation of 125 stents. The patients were followed for 12 months by Doppler ultrasound examinations, stent roentgenograms, and estimation of Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI). Results The mean age of the patients was 73.1 years, and 52.5% were men. Total occlusions were present in 48 patients (47.5%). The mean stent length was 84.3 +/- 45.1 mm (range 40 to 240 mm). A <30% residual stenosis was achieved in 98.0% of procedures. The 6- and 12-month primary patency rates were 94.6 +/- 2.3% and 87.7 +/- 3.7%, respectively, and the secondary patency rates 97.9 +/- 1.5% and 96.5 +/- 2.0%, respectively. Between baseline and 12 months of follow-up, mean ABI increased from 0.58 +/- 0.15 to 0.97 +/- 0.18, and mean RBC decreased from 3.1 +/- 0.9 to 1.4 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Radiographs performed on 51 patients, at a mean of 15.2 months, confirmed the absence of stent fractures in 100% of examinations. Conclusions Over a 12-month observation period, the patency rate and durability of SUPERA stents implanted for severe popliteal artery disease were high. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013;6:65-71) (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据