4.6 Article

Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Abciximab in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction DEBATER: The Eindhoven Reperfusion Study

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 313-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.11.009

关键词

abciximab; bare-metal stent(s) (BMS); sirolimus-eluting stent(s) (SES); ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

资金

  1. Johnson & Johnson (Cordis)
  2. Guidant
  3. Abbott
  4. Friends of the Heart Foundation (Stichting Vrienden van het Hart) in Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  5. St. Jude Medical
  6. Maquett

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The goal of this study was to demonstrate superiority of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) over baremetal stents (BMS) and of abciximab over no abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background Drug-eluting stents (DES) are increasingly used in primary PCI, but the recommendations for use in primary PCI are based on a few randomized controlled trials with selected patients. The usefulness of abciximab in primary PCI is not established. Methods Nine hundred seven patients referred to the Catharina Hospital were randomized to SES or BMS, and to abciximab or no abciximab in a prospective, randomized, open 2 X 2 factorial trial with blinded evaluation. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat revascularization, and bleeding at 1 year (stent arm) and the composite of death, target vessel MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and bleeding at 30 days (abciximab arm). Results At 1 year, the rate of MACCE was lower in the SES arm (16.5% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001), mainly driven by less repeat revascularization (9.8% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.003) and without influencing the cumulative incidence of death and MI (5.2% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.68). At 30 days, the rate of the composite of death, target vessel MI, TVR, and bleeding was lower in the abciximab arm (8.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.04), mainly driven by less TVR due to less stent thrombosis (1.2% vs.7.4%, p < 0.001). However, bleeding complications occurred more frequently in the abciximab group (5.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). Conclusions Primary PCI with SES reduces adverse events at 1 year, mainly by reduction of repeat revascularization, whereas abciximab reduces early stent thrombosis, at the expense of more bleeding complications. (Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents With or Without Abciximab in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [DEBATER]; NCT00986050) (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:313-22) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据