4.5 Article

Phase I dose-escalating study of panobinostat (LBH589) Administered intravenously to Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

期刊

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 1950-1957

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-011-9751-0

关键词

Panobinostat (LBH589); HDAC inhibitor; Phase I study; Thrombocytopenia; Solid tumor

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma [CLBH589A1101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Panobinostat (LBH589) is a potent pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor. As a result of promising preclinical data, Phase I and II clinical trials of intravenous and oral panobinostat have been conducted in patients with a wide variety of hematologic and solid tumors. This is the first report of a phase I study to evaluate intravenous panobinostat given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with solid tumors. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of panobinostat by evaluating the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included characterizing the pharmacokinetics and assessing antitumor activity. Fourteen patients were assigned to three dose levels (Cohort 1: 10 mg/m(2) [three patients], Cohort 2: 15 mg/m(2) [three patients], Cohort 3: 20 mg/m(2) [eight patients]), according to a standard 3 + 3 design. One patient who received 20 mg/m(2) had a DLT (grade 3 elevation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase for > 7 days). Thrombocytopenia was observed in all patients (grade 3 or 4 in 8), the severity of which was dependent on the dose and platelet count at baseline. The thrombocytopenia rapidly resolved within 8 days. Plasma panobinostat levels increased dose dependently, without clinically significant drug accumulation. Stable disease for a parts per thousand yen4 months was observed in six patients; however, there were no complete or partial responses. It is feasible to conclude that 20 mg/m(2) was the MTD and recommend as the starting dose for phase II clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据