4.4 Review

Aluminum transfer during dialysis: a systematic review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1361-1365

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0752-8

关键词

Aluminum; Dialysis; Hemodialysis; Transfer; Clearance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dialysis-dependent patients are particularly susceptible to the toxic effects of aluminum (Al) because of their impaired ability to eliminate it. Al contamination of dialysis fluid remains a threat in this population. The mechanism for Al diffusion across dialysis membranes is not well established. Our objective is to verify, in AL-exposed patients, the postulate that the direction of Al transfer is predicted by the concentration gradient between free diffusible plasma Al and dialysate Al. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Only papers which included Al plasma concentration ([Al]p), Al dialysate concentration ([Al]d) and direction of Al transfer (positive = from dialysate to plasma, negative = from plasma to dialysate) were selected. We also included four patients from our own cohort. Assuming that [Al]p has an ultrafiltrable fraction between 17 and 23 %, cases were considered in keeping with our hypothesis if any of the following scenarios was present: negative Al transfer when [Al]d < [Al]p*23 % and positive Al transfer when [Al]d > [Al]p*17 %. The search yielded 409 articles, of which 12 were selected for review. When reviewing individual patients for analysis, 108 out of 115 (94 %) patients followed our hypothesis. By further excluding cases in which Al transfer could not be determined, only three out of 111 patients were contrary to out hypothesis. Comparing ultrafiltrable Al to dialysate Al permits to accurately predict the direction of Al transfer. The optimal [Al]d should be < 20 % of the maximally acceptable [Al]p. In order to follow K/DOQI guidelines ([Al]p < 20 mu g/L), the [Al]d should therefore not exceed 4 mu g/L. At the level presently supported by K/DOQI ([Al]d < 10 mu g/L), [Al]p could realistically reach 50 mu g/L and potentially cause toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据