4.5 Article

The structure and validity of self-reported affect in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 887-898

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S104161021100041X

关键词

visual analogue scales; positive affect; negative affect; factor structure; emotion; self-report; dementia

资金

  1. Boston University Medical Campus General Clinical Research Center [M01-RR000533]
  2. Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL-RR025771]
  3. Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Core Center [P30AG13846]
  4. [R01MH080295]
  5. [R01CA129769]
  6. [R01-HG02213]
  7. [K24-AG027841]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study determined the reliability, validity, and factor structure of self-report emotions in persons with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relative to controls. Methods: Participants (mild AD, n = 73; MCI, n = 159; controls, n = 96) rated current emotions with the Visual Analogue Mood Scales (Stern, 1997). Results: Internal consistency reliabilities were comparable across groups, as were the factor structures of emotion. Persons with AD reported more negative affect (NA) than persons with MCI and controls. The emotion that most differentiated groups was confusion. NA and PA may be more bipolar in persons with AD than for persons with MCI and controls. Conclusions: The underlying structure of affect was similar in persons with mild AD, MCI, and controls. Further, persons with MCI appeared to be transitional between cognitive health and dementia with regard to mood and affect. That is, participants with MCI tended to have affect scores that were intermediate between those with AD and controls. Implications for interventions to improve emotional well-being in AD and MCI are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据