4.7 Review

Thermodynamic and kinetic models for describing microstructure evolution during joining of metals and alloys

期刊

INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 333-367

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/095066009X12506720908654

关键词

Computational modeling; Welding; Brazing and soldering; Microstructure; Characterization; Thermodynamics and kinetics; Metals and alloys; Review

资金

  1. Department of Integrated Systems Engineering and Edison Welding Institute
  2. US Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ability to predict weld microstructure is critical for introduction of new materials, as well as, optimization of existing materials. Complexity of weld microstructure evolution is related to interaction of phase stability, multicomponent diffusion, steep temperature gradients and morphological instabilities during rapid heating and cooling. In the past two decades, computational thermodynamic and kinetic models have been developed to predict these interactions in wide range of alloys. In the first section, a brief introduction of thermodynamic and kinetic models is given. Models for free energy of solid solution and compound phases, as a function of composition and temperature, are discussed. The underlying assumptions of kinetic models, including local equilibrium at the interface and conditions, are highlighted. In the second section, adoption of these models for predicting weld microstructure evolutions is demonstrated with practical examples from structural alloys. The examples focus on the phase transformations that may occur in liquid state (e.g. inclusion formation), during solidification (e.g. solidification range, phase selection, and segregation) and during solid-state transformations (e.g. growth and dissolution of second phases). In the third section, challenges and opportunities facing widespread use of these tools, as well as, validation using high-resolution and in-situ characterization tools are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据