4.5 Article

Simulated western spruce budworm defoliation reduces torching and crowning potential: a sensitivity analysis using a physics-based fire model

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 709-720

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF13074

关键词

canopy bulk density; CFD; Computational Fluid Dynamic model; critical surface fire intensity; Douglas-fir; fire behaviour; fuel moisture; surface fire intensity; WFDS; wildland-urban interface fire dynamic simulator

类别

资金

  1. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station [09-JV-11221637-195]
  2. USDA-USDI Joint Fire Science Program [09-1-06-5]
  3. University of Oregon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread, native defoliator western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman) reduces canopy fuels, which might affect the potential for surface fires to torch (ignite the crowns of individual trees) or crown (spread between tree crowns). However, the effects of defoliation on fire behaviour are poorly understood. We used a physics-based fire model to examine the effects of defoliation and three aspects of how the phenomenon is represented in the model (the spatial distribution of defoliation within tree crowns, potential branchwood drying and model resolution). Our simulations suggest that fire intensity and crowning are reduced with increasing defoliation compared with un-defoliated trees, regardless of within-crown fuel density, but torching is only reduced with decreasing crown fuel density. A greater surface fire intensity was required to ignite the crown of a defoliated compared with an un-defoliated tree of the same crown base height. The effects of defoliation were somewhat mitigated by canopy fuel heterogeneity and potential branchwood drying, but these effects, as well as computational cell size, were less pronounced than the effect of defoliation itself on fire intensity. Our study suggests that areas heavily defoliated by western spruce budworm may inhibit the spread of crown fires and promote non-lethal surface fires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据