4.4 Article

Roseivivax roseus sp nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from a solar saltern soil sample

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.061630-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'Procurement and development of foreign biological resources' (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of the Korean government
  2. KRIBB Research Initiative Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81173026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pink, Gram-stain-negative, motile, halotolerant bacterium with subpolar flagellum, designated strain BH87090(T), was isolated from a saline soil sample collected from the south-west coastal area of South Korea (125 degrees 58' 58.08 '' E 34 degrees 45' 37.32 '' N). The isolate formed opaque pink to red colonies on marine agar plates at 30 degrees C. The polar lipid profile consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine and one unidentified phospholipid. The sole respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-10 (Q-10). The major cellular fatty acids were C-18:1 omega 7c, C-19:0 cyclo omega 8c, C-16:0 and 11-methyl C-18:1 omega 7c. The genomic DNA G+C content was 61.8 mol%. These chemotaxonomic characteristics were all consistent with specific properties of the genus Roseivivax. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the isolate affiliated to the cluster with members of the genus Roseivivax in the Roseobacter Glade, which suggested that the strain belonged to the genus Roseivivax. However, the low 16S rRNA gene similarities (93.5-95.3%) of strain BH87090(T) with all the members of the genus Roseivivax indicated that it represented a novel species of the genus Roseivivax. On the basis of phenotypic and genotypic data, strain BH87090(T) should be classified as a novel species of the genus Roseivivax. The name Roseivivax roseus sp. nov. is proposed, with strain BH87090(T) (=DSM 23042(T)=KCTC 22650(T)) as the type strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据