4.4 Article

Polynucleobacter difficilis sp nov., a planktonic freshwater bacterium affiliated with subcluster B1 of the genus Polynucleobacter

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.031393-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P19853]
  2. ESF [FWF 1 482-B09]
  3. Austrian Exchange Service (OeAD)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 482] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P19853] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strain AM-8B5(T), isolated from Lake Seven in Armenia, was characterized phenotypically, chemotaxonomically and phylogenetically. This chemo-organoheterotrophic, aerobic, facultatively anaerobic, catalase-and oxidase-positive, non-motile strain grew on NSY medium at NaCl concentrations of 0.0-0.2% (w/v) and at 4-30 degrees C. Whole-cell fatty acids were dominated by summed feature 3 (including C-16:1 omega 7c and iso-C-15:0 2-OH), C-16:0 and C-18:1 omega 7c. C-12:0 2-OH and C-16:1 2-OH were the only hydroxylated fatty acids detected. Phylogenetic analysis as well as phenotypic and chemotaxonomic similarities indicated that the novel isolate was affiliated with the genus Polynucleobacter. 16S rRNA gene similarity values with the four previously described Polynucleobacter species ranged from 96.2 to 98.7%. DNA DNA hybridization experiments showed that the isolate did not belong to any of the previously described Polynucleobacter species. The isolate could be distinguished from all previously established Polynucleobacter species based on chemotaxonomic and phenotypic traits. The bacterium possessed a free-living lifestyle and represents a group of bacteria inhabiting the water column of many freshwater lakes. Based on the revealed phylogeny, and chemotaxonomic and phenotypic differences to previously described Polynucleobacter species, it is proposed that the isolate represents a novel species, Polynucleobacter difficilis sp. nov.; the type strain is AM-8B5(T) (=DSM 22349(T)=CIP 110078(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据