4.4 Article

Bifidobacterium stercoris sp nov., isolated from human faeces

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.019943-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Food & Drug Administration [09172KFDA996]
  2. Food & Drug Administration (KFDA), Republic of Korea [09172KFDA996] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strain Eg1(T), an anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, non-motile and non-spore-forming bacterium, was isolated from human faeces. The optimal temperature for growth was 37 degrees C and tests for oxidase and catalase activities gave negative results. Fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase activity was detected. Acid was produced during fermentation of several substrates, including glucose. The end products of glucose fermentation were acetic acid and lactic acid, which were produced in a molar ratio of 1.76 : 1 (approximately 3 : 2). The G+C content was 57.8 mol%. Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain Eg1(T) was closely related to Bifidobacterium adolescentis YIT 4011(T) (98.36% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity) and Bifidobacterium ruminantium JCM 8222(T) (97.93%) and analysis of hsp60 sequences showed that strain Eg1(T) was closely related to B. adolescentis JCM 1275(T) (99.35% hsp60 sequence similarity) and B. ruminantium JCM 8222(T) (92.13%). However, despite these degrees of similarity being high enough for strain Eg1(T) to be included at the same species level as B. adolescentis and B. ruminantium (96.5-100% for the genus Bifidobacterium), the isolate could be distinguished from B. adolescent is KCTC 3216(T) and B. ruminantium KCTC 3425(T) by low levels of DNA-DNA relatedness (41 and 17%, respectively). Based on phenotypic, genotypic and phylogenetic analyses, we propose that strain Eg1(T) is classified in a novel species, Bifidobacterium stercoris sp. nov. The type strain is Eg1(T) (=KCTC 5756(T) =JCM 15918(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据