4.4 Article

Litorimonas taeanensis gen. nov., sp nov., isolated from a sandy beach

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.022129-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology, Korea/Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (MOST/KOSEF) [R15-2003-012-02002-0]
  2. 21C Frontier Microbial Genomics and Application Center [MG05-0104-4-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [MG05-0104-4-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A heterotrophic, Gram-negative, prosthecate bacterium, designated strain G5(T), was isolated from a sandy beach of Taean in South Korea. Cells of strain G5(T) were aerobic, catalase- and oxidase-positive, straight to slightly curved motile rods with a single flagellum and formed yellow orange colonies on agar. Growth occurred at 15-40 degrees C (optimum 25-30 degrees C) and pH 6-9 (optimum pH 7-8). The major cellular fatty acids were C(18:1)omega 7c, C(17:0), C(16:0), 11-methyl C(18:1)omega 7c, C(17:1)omega 8c and C(17:1)omega 6c. The polar lipid pattern indicated the presence of phosphatidylglycerol, monoglycosyldiglyceride, glucuronopyranosyldiglyceride and two unidentified glycolipids. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 63.6 mol% and the major quinone was Q-10. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain G5(T) belonged to the branch containing the genera Hellea, Robiginitomaculum and Hypomonas within the family Hyphomonadaceae. Within this group, strain G5(T) was most closely related to Hellea balneolensis 26III/A02/215(T) with 95.8% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Based on its phylogenetic position and its phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and molecular properties, strain G5(T) represents a novel species of a novel genus of the family Hyphomonadaceae, for which the name Litorimonas taeanensis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is G5(T) (=KACC 13701(T) =DSM 22008(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据