4.4 Article

Micrococcus endophyticus sp nov., isolated from surface-sterilized Aquilaria sinensis roots

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.006296-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2004CB719601]
  2. Yunnan Education Commission Foundation [06Y15413]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, PR China [2006DFA33550]
  4. Korea Foundation for International Cooperation of Science and Technology
  5. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in the Global partnership Program
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talent in University (NCET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Gram-positive bacterial strain, designated YIM 56238(T), was isolated from plant roots (Aquilaria sinensis), and characterized by using a polyphasic approach. Strain YIM 56238(T) grew optimally at pH 7.0-8.0 and at 28 degrees C. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain YIM 56238(T) indicated that it belongs to the genus Micrococcus. Chemotaxonomic data strongly supported the classification of this strain within the genus Micrococcus: the cell-wall peptidoglycan contained lysine, glutamic acid, alanine and glycine; the predominant menaquinones were MK-8(H-2) (63.6%) and MK-7(H-2) (21.1%); the phospholipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol and an unknown ninhydrinnegative phospholipid; and the major cellular fatty acids were iso-C-15:0 (30.95%) and anteiso-C-15:0 (53.75%). The G + C content of the genomic DNA was 72.9 mol%. A number of physiological features were found that clearly distinguished strain YIM 56238(T) from recognized species of the genus Micrococcus. DNA-DNA hybridization studies suggested that the novel strain represents a separate genomic species. On the basis of the data, therefore, strain YIM 56238(T) represents a novel species of the genus Micrococcus, for which the name Micrococcus endophyticus sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is YIM 56238(T) (=DSM 17945(T) = KCTC 19156(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据