4.0 Article

Rectal Chlamydia in heterosexual women: more questions than answers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 587-592

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0956462413515637

关键词

Chlamydia trachomatis; sexually transmitted infection; rectal; Chlamydia load; heterosexual women; sexual behaviour

资金

  1. Cornwall and Plymouth Research Ethics Committee (REC) [12/SW/0068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to observe the proportion of concurrent rectal Chlamydia (RCt) infection in women who have cervical Chlamydia (CCt) and to observe whether there was any correlation with receptive anal intercourse (RAI). Untreated CCt-positive women were invited to take part. Women chose either to have a physician-collected or self-taken rectal swab. Treatment was then commenced. 17 samples were physician-collected and 80 were self-collected. 75/97 (77.3%, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 69.0-85.7%) were RCt positive. 25/97 (25.8%, 95%CI 17.1-34.5%) reported RAI. There was no difference in the positivity rate whether RAI was reported (80%) or not (76%) (P = 0.71); or whether swabs were physician-collected (65%) or self-taken (80%) (P = 0.17). Only one of those with RCt reported rectal symptoms. One woman had concurrent gonococcal infection. 34/97 (35%) had a history of past sexually transmitted infections. Verified contact attendance was 0.52 and 72% of verified contacts were Chlamydia positive. Reported RAI may not be helpful in guiding RCt testing. RCt infection in women may be more prevalent than previously thought. We do not know whether RCt infections are clinically significant or whether they may act as a reservoir for re-infection. RCt infections in women require further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据