4.4 Article

Evaluation of a Field Test to Assess Performance in Elite Cyclists

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 160-166

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243222

关键词

cycling; power output; athletic performance; exercise physiology; exercise test

资金

  1. Bundeskanzleramt fur Sport, besondere Sportforderung (Austria)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to assess the reproducibility of power output during a 4 min (TT4) and a 20 min (TT20) time-trial and the relationship with performance markers obtained during a laboratory graded exercise test (GXT). Ventilatory and lactate thresholds during a GXT were measured in competitive male cyclists (n = 15; (V) over dotO(2max) 67 +/- 5 ml.min(-1).kg(-1); P(max) 440 +/- 38W). Two 4 min and 20 min time-trials were performed on flat roads. Power output was measured using a mobile power-meter (SRM). Strong intraclass-correlations for TT4 (r = 0.98; 95 % CL: 0.92-0.99) and TT20 (r = 0.98; 95 % CL: 0.95-0.99) were observed. TT4 showed a bias +/- random error of -0.8 +/- 23W or -0.2 +/- 5.5%. During TT20 the bias +/- random error was -1.8 +/- 14W or 0.6 +/- 4.4%. Both time-trials were strongly correlated with performance measures from the GXT (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed between power output during TT4 and GXT measures (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between TT20 and power output at the second lactate-turn-point (LTP2) (p = 0.98) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) (p = 0.97). In conclusion, TT4 and TT20 mean power outputs are reliable predictors of aerobic endurance. TT20 was in agreement with power output at RCP and LTP2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据