4.2 Article

Influence of carbohydrate-protein beverage on cycling endurance and indices of muscle disruption

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.18.4.363

关键词

sports beverages; fatigue; performance; recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbohydrate-protein (CHO+Pro) beverages reportedly improve endurance and indices of muscle disruption, but it is unclear whether these effects are related to total energy intake or specific effects of protein. Purpose: The authors examined effects of CHO+Pro on time to exhaustion and markers of muscle disruption compared with placebo (PLA) and carbohydrate beverages matched for carbohydrate (CHO) and total calories (CHO+CHO). Methods: Eleven male cyclists completed 4 rides to exhaustion at 75% VO2peak. Participants consumed 250 ml of PLA, CHO (7.75%), CHO+CHO (9.69%), or CHO+Pro (7.75%/1.94%) every 15 min until fatigue, in a double-blind design. Results: Time to exhaustion was significantly longer) < .05) in CHO+Pro (126.2 +/- 25.4 min) and CHO+CHO (121.3 +/- 36.8) than PLA (107.1 +/- 30.3). CHO (117.5 +/- 24.2) and PLA were not significantly different. Similarly, CHO+Pro was not significantly different from CHO and CHO+CHO. Postexercise plasma creatine kinase was lower after CHO+Pro (197.2 +/- 149.2 IU/L) than PLA (407.4 +/- 391.3), CHO (373.2 +/- 416.6), and CHO+CHO (412.3 +/- 410.2). Postexercise serum myoglobin was lower in CHO+Pro (47.0 +/- 27.4 ng/mL) than all other treatments (168.8 +/- 217.3, 82.6 +/- 71.3, and 72.0 +/- 75.8). Postexercise leg extensions at 70% 1 RM were significantly greater 24 hr after CHO+Pro (11.3 +/- 4.1) than PLA (8.8 +/- 3.7), CHO (9.7 +/- 4.3), and CHO+CHO (9.5 +/- 3.6). Conclusion: These findings suggest that at least some of the reported improvements in endurance with CHO+Pro beverages might be related to caloric differences between treatments. Postexercise improvements in markers of muscle disruption with CHO+Pro ingestion appear to be independent of carbohydrate and caloric content and were elicited with beverages consumed only during exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据