3.9 Article

Dmrt5 Controls Corticotrope and Gonadotrope Differentiation in the Zebrafish Pituitary

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 187-199

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2014-1176

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund (MOE-AcRF) [R-154-000-329-133, R-154-000-478-112]
  2. Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore
  3. Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research
  4. National University of Singapore, Department of Biological Sciences (NUS-DBS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dmrt transcription factors control sex determination or sex-specific differentiation across all invertebrate and vertebrate species, in which they have been studied so far. In addition to important functions in the reproductive system, also nongonadal roles have been assigned to several dmrt family members. One example is dmrt5, which was shown to guide neurogenesis in the forebrain of some vertebrates including fish. Here we show that in zebrafish, dmrt5 is also expressed adjacent to the pituitary anlage and later in the anterior pars distalis in which it organizes differentiation of endocrine cells. We find that pituitary induction, cell survival, proliferation, and early lineage specification in the pituitary is independent of dmrt5. Instead, dmrt5 is required for terminal differentiation of corticotropes and gonadotropes. Gene knockdown and mutant analysis revealed that dmrt5 promotes corticotrope differentiation via tbx19 expression, whereas it prevents gonadotrope differentiation in the anterior pars distalis. In dmrt5 morphants and mutants, reduced corticotrope numbers may result in irregular positioning and reduced maintenance of lactotropes. In conclusion, our study establishes a novel function for dmrt5 for cell differentiation in the anterior pituitary. Intriguingly, its effect on gonadotrope numbers defines a first nongonadal role for a dmrt family member that appears crucial for the activity of the reproductive system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据