4.6 Article

Modelling the diurnal variations of urban heat islands with multi-source satellite data

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 34, 期 21, 页码 7568-7588

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2013.821576

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41101380, 41071258]
  2. Chinese State Key Basic Research Project [2013CB733406]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2011M500145]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [ZYGX2010J087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Examination of the diurnal variations in surface urban heat islands (UHIs) has been hindered by incompatible spatial and temporal resolutions of satellite data. In this study, a diurnal temperature cycle genetic algorithm (DTC-GA) approach was used to generate the hourly 1km land-surface temperature (LST) by integrating multi-source satellite data. Diurnal variations of the UHI in ideal' weather conditions in the city of Beijing were examined. Results show that the DTC-GA approach was applicable for generating the hourly 1km LSTs. In the summer diurnal cycle, the city experienced a weak UHI effect in the early morning and a significant UHI effect from morning to night. In the diurnal cycles of the other seasons, the city showed transitions between a significant UHI effect and weak UHI or urban heat sink effects. In all diurnal cycles, daytime UHIs varied significantly but night-time UHIs were stable. Heating/cooling rates, surface energy balance, and local land use and land cover contributed to the diurnal variations in UHI. Partial analysis shows that diurnal temperature range had the most significant influence on UHI, while strong negative correlations were found between UHI signature and urban and rural differences in the normalized difference vegetation index, albedo, and normalized difference water index. Different contributions of surface characteristics suggest that various strategies should be used to mitigate the UHI effect in different seasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据