4.7 Article

A hybrid model for analysis of ductile fracture in micro-scaled plastic deformation of multiphase alloys

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 1-16

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.006

关键词

Micro-scaled plastic deformation; Multiphase metal; Ductile fracture prediction; Stress-induced fracture map

资金

  1. Hong Kong Government [B-Q33F]
  2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YK10, G-YM93, G-U923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a critical issue in micro-scaled plastic deformation, viz., microforming, the effects of workpiece geometry and material grain sizes on ductile fracture behavior have been studied. However, the flow stress contribution of each phase in multiphase alloys to the ductile fracture and deformation behaviors in microforming has not yet been fully addressed. In this paper, a hybrid model is proposed for modeling and representing the fracture and deformation behaviors in microforming processes. The proposed model calculates fracture energy and then predicts the fracture strain of the alloys with single or multiphase. The model is considered to be more accurate in fracture prediction as it considers the influence of size effect on material fracture energy. Using brass C3602 with different grain sizes obtained via heat treatment as the testing material, the grain and feature size effects are investigated. Through the finite element simulation by using the developed hybrid model and physical experiment, the methodology to represent and model the influence of metal phase on deformation and fracture behaviors in micro-scaled plastic deformation of multiphase alloys is presented. Also, to compare the difference between grain and geometry size effects, the stress-induced fracture map, which articulates the relationship of size effect, fracture energy and the expected fracture strain in microforming, is proposed and constructed for fracture prediction in microforming processes. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据