4.7 Article

Modeling inelastic behavior of magnesium alloys during cyclic loading-unloading

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 49-64

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.007

关键词

Inelasticity; Cyclic loading; Twinning; Crystal plasticity; Magnesium

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [FWP-06SCPE401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inelastic behavior presenting in magnesium alloys during cyclic loading-unloading have been investigated through the finite strain elastic viscoplastic self-consistent (EVPSC) model for polycrystals (EVPSC-TDT), which has been updated by implementing the twinning and de-twinning (TDT) model. Corresponding to the existing experiments of extruded bars of Mg alloys, we constructed the extruded bars of magnesium alloys with different initial textures in our simulations to study the effects of initial textures and deformation processes (tension and compression) on inelastic behavior during cyclic loading and unloading. Taking the advantage of numerical modeling, the evolution of the instantaneous gradients, the activity of the deformation mechanisms and the evolution of twin volume fraction are characterized to interpret the inelastic behavior. We found that the alternation of deformation mechanisms corresponds to the inelastic behavior; in particular, the inelastic behavior becomes more pronounced when twinning and de-twinning are activated. Thus, a strong extrusion texture reduces the hysteresis loops of the loading-unloading cycle under uniaxial tension, while magnifies the inelastic behavior under uniaxial compression, because twinning and de-twinning are more active for extrude bars with the strong extrusion texture under compression. The simulated results are in agreement with the available experimental observations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据