4.7 Article

A micromechanics-based model for shear-coupled grain boundary migration in bicrystals

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 68-94

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.011

关键词

Grain boundary motion; Constitutive behavior; Micromechanics; Molecular dynamics; Copper

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-07-BLAN-0186]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-BLAN-0186] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A complete micromechanics-based model is here proposed using the concepts of continuum kinematics and thermodynamics. A new constitutive framework is proposed to describe stress-induced shear-coupled grain boundary (GB) migration. Like non diffusive phase-transformations, shear-coupled GB migration can be considered on the thermodynamics point of view of conservative nature until high temperature with respect to melting point (i.e., diffusionless but thermally activated). The micromechanics-based continuum model can include intra-crystalline slip, GB sliding and shear-coupled GB migration as additive dissipative mechanisms. To illustrate the present theory, the model is applied to shear-coupled GB migration in the case of three flat Cu bi-crystals [001] with symmetric tilt GB (STGB): Sigma 17(410) (theta = 28.07 degrees), Sigma 5(210) (theta = 53.13 degrees), Sigma 41(540) (theta = 77.32 degrees). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations under simple shear loading are first performed to identify the active shear coupling modes, the stick-slip behavior at 0 K and 500 K and the bicrystal finite size dependence on the shear stress responses. The results of the micromechanical model are discussed in comparison with MD simulations. The effects of anisotropic vs. isotropic elastic properties on effective elastic shear Moduli, overall shear stress drop magnitudes and dissipated energy during GB migration are analyzed for these STGB. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据