4.7 Article

Prolonged local retention of subcutaneously injected polymers monitored by noninvasive SPECT imaging

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 476, 期 1-2, 页码 164-168

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.053

关键词

SPECT imaging; Subcutaneous injection; Polymer; Dendrimer; Poly(glutamic acid)

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [26410227]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26410227] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymers are widely applied to drug delivery systems because polymers are generally excreted from the body more slowly than small molecules. Subcutaneous injection is one plausible means of administration. In this study, the in vivo behaviors of subcutaneously injected polymers, linear poly (glutamic acid) (Poly-Glu), acetylated dendrimer (Ac-den) and collagen peptide-conjugated dendrimer (CP-den), were investigated. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging was used to noninvasively monitor the in vivo behaviors. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) was conjugated to these polymers, which were labeled with radioactive In-111. These In-111-DTPA-bearing polymers (Poly-Glu- DTPA, Ac-den-DTPA and CP-den-DTPA) and unconjugated DTPA were subcutaneously injected into tumor-bearing mice, which were subjected to SPECT imaging. These In-111-DTPA-bearing polymers were largely retained at the injection site for at least 1 day, whereas the unconjugated DTPA was rapidly cleared from the whole body through excretion. Poly-Glu-DTPA and Ac-den-DTPA were partly accumulated in the kidney (and the liver), but the CP-den-DTPA was not. However, these In-111-DTPA-bearing polymers were accumulated in the liver and the kidney following intravenous administration. These results indicate that the subcutaneously injected polymers did not largely gain substantial access to the systemic circulation, which is useful for a depot of drug around the injection site. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据