4.7 Article

Liposomal encapsulation of the natural flavonoid fisetin improves bioavailability and antitumor efficacy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 444, 期 1-2, 页码 146-154

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.01.050

关键词

Fisetin; Liposomes; Pharmacokinetics; Lewis lung carcinoma; Cyclophosphamide; Anticancer effect

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Institut National du Cancer (INCa, Boulogne-Billancourt, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural flavonoid fisetin (3,3',4',7-tetrahydroxyflavone) has shown antiangiogenic and anticancer properties. Because of fisetin limited water solubility, we designed a liposomal formulation and evaluated its biological properties in vitro and in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) bearing mice. A liposomal formulation was developed with DOPC and DODA-PEG2000, possessing a diameter in the nanometer range (173.5 +/- 2.4 nm), a high homogeneity (polydispersity index 0.181 +/- 0.016) and high fisetin encapsulation (58%). Liposomal fisetin incubated with LLC cells were internalized, induced a typical fisetin morphological effect and increased the sub-G1 cell distribution. In vivo, liposomal fisetin allowed a 47-fold increase in relative bioavailability compared to free fisetin. The effect of liposomal fisetin on LLC tumor growth in mice at low dose (21 mg/kg) allowed a higher tumor growth delay (3.3 days) compared to free fisetin at the same dose (1.6 day). Optimization of liposomal fisetin therapy was attempted by co-treatment with cyclophosphamide which led to a significant improvement in tumor growth delay (7.2 days) compared to cyclophosphamide with control liposomes (4.2 days). In conclusion, fisetin liposomes markedly improved fisetin bioavailability and anticancer efficacy in mice and this formulation could facilitate the administration of this flavonoid in the clinical setting. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据