4.4 Article

Loss of function of PGAP1 as a cause of severe encephalopathy identified by Whole Exome Sequencing: Lessons of the bioinformatics pipeline

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 323-329

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2015.05.012

关键词

Analysis pipeline; Encephalopathy; Intellectual disability; PGAP1; Retinal dystrophy; Whole Exome Sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated a multiple consanguineous Turkish family with two children, a boy and a girl, affected by severe encephalopathy, hypotonia, microcephaly and retinal dystrophy by a combination of linkage analysis and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES). We analyzed the sequence data by two different bioinformatics pipelines which did not differ in overall processing strategy but involved differences in software used, minor allele frequency (MAF) thresholds and reference data sets, the usage of in-house control exomes and filter settings to prioritize called variants. Assuming autosomal recessive mode of inheritance, only homozygous variants present in both children were considered. The resulting variant lists differed partially (nine variants identified by both pipelines, ten variants by only one pipeline). Major reasons for this discrepancy were different filters for MAF and different variant prioritizations. Combining the variant lists with the results of linkage analysis and further prioritization by expression data and prediction tools, an intronic homozygous splice variant (c.1090-2A>G; IVS9-2A>G; p.?) in PGAP1 (Post-GPI Attachment To Proteins 1) was identified and validated by cDNA analysis. PGAP1 ensures the first step of maturation of GPI (glycosylphosphatidylinositol)-anchor proteins. Recently, a homozygous loss-of-function mutation in PGAP1 has been reported in one family with two children affected by a similar phenotype. The present report not only illustrates the possible influence of specific filtering settings on the results of WES but also confirms PGAP1 as a cause of severe encephalopathy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据