4.7 Article

Improved plasma stability and sustained release profile of gemcitabine via polypeptide conjugation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 391, 期 1-2, 页码 212-220

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.010

关键词

Gemcitabine; Poly-L-glutamic acid; Polymeric drug conjugates; Sustained release

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia (IRPA) [06-02-02-0015-PR0002/07-05]
  2. University of Malaya [F0173/2005A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance the stability of the anticancer drug gemcitabine (2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine), it was conjugated to poly-L-glutamic acid (PG-H) via a carbodiimide reaction. The synthesised poly-L-glutamic acid-gemcitabine (PG-G) was purified and characterised by using SDS-PAGE to estimate its molecular weight, HPLC to determine its purity and degree of drug loading, and NMR to elucidate the structure. In vitro aqueous hydrolytic studies showed that the gemcitabine release from the polymeric drug conjugate was pH dependent, and that the conjugation to PG-H improved its stability in human plasma. The release of the bound gemcitabine from PG-G in plasma was mediated by a hydrolytic process. It began with a lag phase, followed by linear release between 12 and 48 h, and reached equilibrium at 72 h with 51% of the gemcitabine released. In vitro cytotoxicity studies using MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human mammary cancer cells, as well as human dermal fibroblasts (HDF), showed that PG-G displayed a lower dose dependent cytotoxic effect with respect to the parent drug gemcitabine. On the other hand, in 4T1 mouse mammary tumour cells, PG-G and gemcitabine showed similar toxicities. Gemcitabine was more than likely released hydrolytically from PG-G and taken up by MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HDF, whereas both released gemcitabine and PG-G were taken up by 4T1 to mediate the observed cytotoxicities. The improved stability and extended sustained release profile may render PG-G a potential anticancer prodrug. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据