4.6 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: MicroRNA-449 suppresses proliferation of hepatoma cell lines through blockade lipid metabolic pathway related to SIRT1 (Retracted article. See vol. 63, 2023)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 2143-2152

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2596

关键词

microRNA; SIRT1; proliferation; SREBP-1c; lipid metabolism; hepatocellular carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30600524, 81341067, 81071990, 81201758]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2012A030400055, 2010B080701088, 2011B080701096, 2011B031800184]
  3. Science and Technology projects of Guangzhou [20111410010, 2011J4300066]
  4. Special Project of Beijing Health Development and Scientific Research, China [2011-5041-02]
  5. Key Projects in the PLA's logistics Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [BWS11J029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNA (miRNA or miR) inhibition of oncogenic related pathways has been shown to be a promising therapeutic approach for cancer. SIRT1 might be a promoter factor on tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the mechanism is unknown. We investigated whether miRNAs regulate the SIRT1 and its downstream SREBP-lipogenesis-cholesterogenesis metabolic pathway in hepatoma cells. Human hepatoma cells were transfected with miR-449 mimics and inhibitors, and the effects of miR-449 on cell proliferation was assessed. We identified the miRNAs, miR-449, that control lipogenesis and cholesterogenesis in hepatoma cells by inhibiting SIRT1 and SREBP-1c expression and downregulating their targeted genes, including fatty acid synthase (FASN) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGCR). MiR-449 repressed DNA synthesis, mitotic entry and proliferation of hepatoma cells. Restoration of miR-449 led to suppression of SIRT1 expression and liver tumorigenesis. The newly identified miRNAs, miR-449 represents a novel targeting mechanism for HCC therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据