4.6 Article

Androgen receptor decreases CMYC and KRAS expression by upregulating let-7a expression in ER-, PR-, AR+ breast cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 229-237

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2151

关键词

estrogen receptor-negative; progesterone receptor-negative; androgen receptor-positive; breast cancer; let-7a; KRAS; CMYC

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generally known that the decision to use anti-estrogen therapy is based on the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancers. Recent studies have shown that androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed in ER-, PR- breast cancer and plays an important role in the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Furthermore, AR can increase the global expression of microRNAs, post-transcriptional gene regulators that play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of breast cancer. In this study, we investigated the functions and relations of AR, related miRNAs and target proteins in ER-, PR-, AR(+) breast cancer. The results showed that androgen-induced AR activating signal directly upregulates let-7a expression, downregulates CMYC and KRAS protein expression, and inhibits cell proliferation in ER-, PR-, AR(+) breast cancer cells. Overexpression of let-7a inhibits cell proliferation and down-regulates CMYC and KRAS protein expression, whereas inhibition of let-7a expression by specific antisense oligonucleotides increases cell growth and upregulates CMYC and KRAS protein expression. We performed in situ hybridization for let-7a and immunohistochemical staining for CMYC and KRAS using sequential sections obtained from surgically-resected breast cancer tissues and observed an inverse correlation between the staining pattern of let-7a and its target proteins. Androgen-induced AR activating signal upregulates let-7a that targets CMYC and KRAS and contributes to ER-, PR-, AR(+) breast cancer pathogenesis. Elucidation of this pathway will help develop new therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据