4.5 Article

Sexual function in obese women:: impact of lower urinary tract dysfunction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1312-1318

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2008.67

关键词

sexual function; lower urinary tract symptoms; women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the impact on sexual function attributed to lower urinary tract dysfunction in a female obese population. Design: We performed a case-control study based on the registry of a university hospital obesity unit. A consecutive sample of women with body mass index(BMI) >= 30 (obese) was randomly matched by age, gender and residential county to control subjects using the computerized Register of the Total Population. Data were collected by a self-reported postal survey including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results: The questionnaire was completed and returned by 279/446 patients (62%) and 430/892 control subjects (48%). Obese women reported significantly lesser satisfaction with their sexual life, more frequent symptoms of urinary incontinence at intercourse, more often fear of urine leakage at intercourse, a higher tendency toward avoiding intercourse and more frequent feelings of guilt and disgust during intercourse (P < 0.001). While considering sexual function in a subset of women with urge or stress urinary incontinence, the overall PISQ-12 scores were significantly lower in obese women compared to their age-matched nonobese controls for both the conditions (P < 0.001). In an adjusted multivariate analysis, a BMI 430 was independently associated with a significantly increased risk for sexual dysfunction (odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.9), as were symptoms of urge or stress urinary incontinence (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.1 and OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.0), respectively. Conclusion: Urge and stress urinary incontinences are more common and have greater impact on sexual function in obese women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据