4.2 Article

Modeling induced pluripotent stem cells from fibroblasts of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 12-21

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2013.789514

关键词

duplication; Duchene muscular dystrophy; induced pluripotent stem cells; neural; cell models

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171229, 81100473, 31200726]
  2. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund [U1132005]
  3. Gangzhou City Science and Technology Administration [2011Y1-00038, 2011A080300002]
  4. Zhujiang Science and Technology Star Project of Guangzhou [2012J2200006]
  5. Natural Science Youth Project of Guangzhou Medical University [2012A09]
  6. Guangdong Higher Education Institutes science and technology innovation project [2012KJCX0087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS cell) lines from patients with incurable diseases is a promising approach for studying disease mechanisms and for drug screening. Such innovation enables us to obtain autologous cell sources for regenerative medicine. Herein, we report the generation and characterization of iPS cells from the fibroblasts of patients with a family history of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD); these fibroblasts were obtained from patients at 22 gestational weeks of age and exhibit exon duplication from exons 16 to 42. The DMD-iPS cells were generated by the ectopic expression of four transcription factors: OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC; the DMD-iPS cells expressed several pluripotency markers and could be differentiated into various somatic cell types both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, DMD-iPSCs showed the differentiation potential to neuronal lineage. Thus, DMD-iPS cells are expected to serve as an in vitro disease model system, which will lay a foundation for the production of autologous cell therapies that avoid immune rejection and enable the correction of gene defects prior to tissue reconstitution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据