4.5 Article

Serotonin transporter genotype is associated with cognitive performance but not regional 5-HT1A receptor binding in humans

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145708009759

关键词

Cognition; PET; serotonin; 5-HT1A; 5-HTTLPR; WCST

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [09114, 8668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene is one of the most extensively Studied in psychiatry. A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the 5-HTT gene (5-HTTLPR) has been associated with several psychiatric disorders as well as anxiety-related personality traits. In search of a mechanistic understanding of the functional implications of 5-HTTLPR, the influence of this polymorphism on regional 5-HT1A receptor density has previously been examined in two positron emission tomography (PET) Studies in humans, yielding, however, contradictory results. In the present Study, 54 control Subjects were examined with [C-11]WAY 100635 PET and a battery of cognitive tests. Regional binding potential (BP) of [C-13]WAY 100635 to 5-HT1A receptor was calculated for the dorsal raphe nuclei, the hippocampus, the anterior cingulate, the insula, the temporal cortex and the frontal cortex. The influence of 5-HTTLPR genotype on regional 5-HT1A BP and cognitive performance was investigated. No differences in 5-HT1A receptor density between carriers and non-carriers of the S allele were found. Thus, we could not replicate any of the previously reported associations between 5-HTTLPR and 5-HT1A density. There was, however, a highly significant association between 5-HTTLPR genotype and performance in Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; carriers of the S allele had a superior performance compared to the LL carriers. These observations suggest that functional implications of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism are not likely to be mediated by differences in 5-HT1A expression levels and that other biomarkers must be considered for future investigations at phenotype level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据