4.7 Article

Biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of a telodendrimer micellar paclitaxel nanoformulation in a mouse xenograft model of ovarian cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 1587-1597

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S29306

关键词

telodendrimer; nanomicelle; paclitaxel; microSPECT/CT; imaging guided drug delivery

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [R01CA140449, R01CA115483, 1R01CA155642]
  2. NIH/NCRR [RR 1313461]
  3. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  4. California Breast Cancer Research Program [14IB-0075]
  5. UC Davis Cancer Center (NCI) [P30CA093373]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A multifunctional telodendrimer-based micelle system was characterized for delivery of imaging and chemotherapy agents to mouse tumor xenografts. Previous optical imaging studies demonstrated qualitatively that these classes of nanoparticles, called nanomicelles, preferentially accumulate at tumor sites in mice. The research reported herein describes the detailed quantitative imaging and biodistribution profiling of nanomicelles loaded with a cargo of paclitaxel. Methods: The telodendrimer was covalently labeled with I-125 and the nanomicelles were loaded with C-14-paclitaxel, which allowed measurement of pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in the mice using microSPECT/CT imaging and liquid scintillation counting, respectively. Results: The radio imaging data showed preferential accumulation of nanomicelles at the tumor site along with a slower clearance rate than paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL (Taxol (R)). Liquid scintillation counting confirmed that C-14-labeled paclitaxel sequestered in nanomicelles had increased uptake by tumor tissue and slower pharmacokinetics than Taxol. Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate that nanomicelle-formulated paclitaxel is a potentially superior formulation compared with Taxol in terms of water solubility, pharmacokinetics, and tumor accumulation, and may be clinically useful for both tumor imaging and improved chemotherapy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据