4.7 Article

High-Content Screening of a Taiwanese Indigenous Plant Extract Library Identifies Syzygium simile leaf Extract as an Inhibitor of Fatty Acid Uptake

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19072130

关键词

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; lipid droplet; high-content screening; metabolic diseases; natural products

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST104-2320-B-037-031-MY3, MOST106-2321-B-037-002]
  2. University of Cologne-Kaohsiung Medical University Alliance (CKA) Research Fund [KMU-SH000151]
  3. Kaohsiung Medical University Research Foundation [105KMUOR05]
  4. Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan [107AS-22.1.2-LI-L]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common liver disease in the recent decades in both developed and developing countries, and is predicted to be the major etiology for liver transplantation in the next decade. Thus, pharmacological strategies to treat NAFLD are urgently needed. Natural products are considered an excellent source for drug discovery. By utilizing an image-based high-throughput screening with a library containing 3000 Taiwanese indigenous plant extracts, we discovered that the extract of Syzygium simile leaves (SSLE) has an anti-lipid droplet (LD) accumulation effect in hepatic cell lines. Analyses of the expression profile of genes involved in lipid metabolism revealed that SSLE suppressed the mRNA expression of CD36, fatty acid translocase. In agreement with this observation, we showed that SSLE inhibited CD36 protein expression and fatty acid uptake and has only limited effects on pre-formed LDs. Moreover, SSLE reduced LD accumulation and CD36 expression in enterocyte and macrophage cell lines. In conclusion, our findings suggest that SSLE could serve as a potential source for the discovery of novel therapeutic modalities for NAFLD and that the suppression of CD36 expression and fatty acid uptake could contribute to the lipid-lowering effect of SSLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据