4.7 Article

Fatty Acid Elongation in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 5762-5773

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms15045762

关键词

diethylnitrosamine; ELOVL6; HCC; hepatic steatosis; leptin deficiency; MCD; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); ob/ob

资金

  1. EASL Dame Sheila Sherlock Fellowship
  2. research committee of Saarland University [61-cl/Anschub2012]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG LA 997/7-1]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [O1KU1216F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represents a risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is characterized by quantitative and qualitative changes in hepatic lipids. Since elongation of fatty acids from C16 to C18 has recently been reported to promote both hepatic lipid accumulation and inflammation we aimed to investigate whether a frequently used mouse NASH model reflects this clinically relevant feature and whether C16 to C18 elongation can be observed in HCC development. Feeding mice a methionine and choline deficient diet to model NASH not only increased total hepatic fatty acids and cholesterol, but also distinctly elevated the C18/C16 ratio, which was not changed in a model of simple steatosis (ob/ob mice). Depletion of Kupffer cells abrogated both quantitative and qualitative methionine-and-choline deficient (MCD)-induced alterations in hepatic lipids. Interestingly, mimicking inflammatory events in early hepatocarcinogenesis by diethylnitrosamine-induced carcinogenesis (48 h) increased hepatic lipids and the C18/C16 ratio. Analyses of human liver samples from patients with NASH or NASH-related HCC showed an elevated expression of the elongase ELOVL6, which is responsible for the elongation of C16 fatty acids. Taken together, our findings suggest a detrimental role of an altered fatty acid pattern in the progression of NASH-related liver disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据