4.6 Article

Isothermal reduction of titanomagnetite concentrates containing coal

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-014-0875-z

关键词

titanomagnetite; carbothermal reduction; thermogravimetric analysis; kinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51090383, 51090382]
  2. Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student
  3. Ministry of Education of China [0903005109081-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isothermal reduction of the Panzhihua titanomagnetite concentrates (PTC) briquette containing coal under argon atmosphere was investigated by thermogravimetry in an electric resistance furnace within the temperature range of 1250-1350A degrees C. The samples reduced in argon at 1350A degrees C for different time were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Model-fitting and model-free methods were used to evaluate the apparent activation energy of the reduction reaction. It is found that the reduction rate is very fast at the early stage, and then, at a later stage, the reduction rate becomes slow and decreases gradually to the end of the reduction. It is also observed that the reduction of PTC by coal depends greatly on the temperature. At high temperatures, the reduction degree reaches high values faster and the final value achieved is higher than at low temperatures. The final phase composition of the reduced PTC-coal briquette consists in iron and ferrous-pseudobrookite (FeTi2O5), while Fe2.75Ti0.25O4, Fe2.5Ti0.5O4, Fe2.25Ti0.75O4, ilmenite (FeTiO3) and wustite (FeO) are intermediate products. The reaction rate is controlled by the phase boundary reaction for reduction degree less than 0.2 with an apparent activation energy of about 68 kJ center dot mol(-1) and by three-dimensional diffusion for reduction degree greater than 0.75 with an apparent activation energy of about 134 kJ center dot mol(-1). For the reduction degree in the range of 0.2-0.75, the reaction rate is under mixed control, and the activation energy increases with the increase of the reduction degree.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据