4.7 Article

Spillover enhanced hydrogen uptake of Pt/Pd doped corncob-derived activated carbon with ultra-high surface area at high pressure

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 25, 页码 13643-13649

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.065

关键词

Corncob-derived; Activated carbon; Hydrogen storage; Hydrogen spillover; Pt/Pd catalyst

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA053305]
  2. International Cooperation Project from Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010DFA64080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corncob-derived activated carbon (CAC) was prepared by potassium hydroxide activation. The Pt/Pd-doped CAC samples were prepared by two-step reduction method (ethylene glycol reduction plus hydrogen reduction). The as-obtained samples were characterized by N-2-sorption, TEM and XRD. The results show the texture of CAC is varied after doping Pt/Pd. The Pd particles are easier to grow up than Pt particles on the surface of activated carbon. For containing Pt samples, the pore size distributions are different from original sample and Pd loaded sample. The hydrogen uptake results show excess hydrogen uptake capacity on the Pt/Pd-doped CAC samples are higher than pure CAC at 298K, which should be attributed to hydrogen spillover effects. The 2.5%Pt and 2.5%Pd hybrid doped CAC sample shows the highest hydrogen uptake capacity (1.65 wt%) at 298 K and 180 bar, The particle size and distribution of Pt/Pd catalysts could play a crucial role on hydrogen uptake by spillover. The total hydrogen storage capacity analysis show that total H-2 storage capacities for all samples are similar, and spillover enhanced H-2 uptakes of metal-doped samples could not well support total H-2 storage capacity. The total pore volume of porous materials also is a key factor to affect total hydrogen storage capacity. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据