4.7 Article

Chemical-looping steam methane reforming over macroporous CeO2-ZrO2 solid solution: Effect of calcination temperature

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 25, 页码 13361-13368

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.116

关键词

CL-SMR; Macroporous CeO2-ZrO2; Oxygen carrier; Hydrogen; Syngas

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51104074, 51174105, 51004060, 51204083, 513744004]
  2. Applied Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province [2012FD016]
  3. Candidate Talents Training Fund of Yunnan Province [2012HB009]
  4. Analysis and Testing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical-looping steam methane reforming (CL-SMR) is a novel process for the coproduction of pure hydrogen and syngas without purification processes. A series of CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides were prepared by colloidal crystal templating method with calcination temperature increasing from 450 to 850 degrees C. The structural characteristic and reducibility of CeO2-ZrO2 oxygen carriers were investigated by SEM, XRD and TPR techniques and correlated to their reactivity for CL-SMR. The CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides calcined at low temperatures (e.g., 450 degrees C) exhibit a better uniform and three-dimensionally ordered macroporous structure, which enhance the mobility of oxygen species, improving the reducibility of CeO2-ZrO2 oxygen carriers. The ordered macroporous structure can lead to a high reactivity for CL-SMR, especially for the hydrogen production in water splitting reaction. It was found that the Ce-Zr-450 sample showed the best performance for H-2 production. After ten redox CL-SMR cycles at 800 degrees C, the Ce-Zr-450 sample still maintained relatively high hydrogen yield and the three-dimensionally ordered macroporous structure remained in good condition, indicating high reactivity and structural stability. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据