4.7 Article

Effects of syngas addition on flame propagation and stability in outwardly propagating spherical dimethyl ether-air premixed flames

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 32, 页码 14102-14114

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.037

关键词

Dimethyl ether; Syngas; Unstretched laminar burning velocity; Markstein length; Cellular instability

资金

  1. Space Core Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [SC0950] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments in outwardly propagating spherical flame were carried out to investigate unstretched laminar burning velocity and flame instability by adding 25%, 50%, and 75% syngas to DME-air mixtures at room temperature and elevated pressures up to 0.3 MPa. The measured unstretched laminar burning velocities were compared to numerical predictions using PREMIX code with Zhao reaction mechanism and good agreement was found between them. Flame instability was also investigated through evaluating Markstein length and cellular instability. Behavior of the Markstein lengths was described well by the deficient reactant Lewis number and highly affected by the amount of syngas addition to the DME-air mixtures. Effects of syngas addition and increased initial pressure on cell formation on the flame surface were also examined through evaluating the Lewis number, flame thickness, and thermal expansion ratio. Regardless of syngas addition, the cellular instability was enhanced mainly by the hydrodynamic instability due to decreased flame thickness while diffusional-thermal instability was minor. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据