4.7 Article

Investigation on thermal, electrical, and electrochemical properties of scandium-doped Pr0.6Sr0.4(Co0.2Fe0.8)1-x)ScxO3-δ as cathode for IT-SOFC

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 3989-3996

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.113

关键词

Scandium; Perovskite; Cathode; Pr0.6Sr0.4(Co0.2Fe0.8)(1-x))ScxO3-delta; SOFC

资金

  1. United Technology Research Center, USA
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [20973111]
  3. 973 Program of China [2007CB209705]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [09ZR1413900, 10520708900, 09XD1402400]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090450695]
  6. National Key Laboratory of Metallic Matrix Composite Material

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic study and evaluation were performed on the effect of scandium doping at the B site of Pr0.6Sr0.4(Co0.2Fe0.8)(1-x))ScxO3-delta (PSCF) on key material properties as cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFC). The doped products Pr0.6Sr0.4(Co0.2Fe0.8)(1-x))ScxO3-delta (PSCFSx, x=0.0-0.2) retained perovskite structure confirmed by X-ray diffraction, and their particles were smaller than the non-doped materials as evidenced by TEM. The electrical conductivity (EC) of PSCFS decreased with increasing Sc3+ content, but EC values were still larger than 100 S cm(-1) in temperature range of 300-800 degrees C as x <= 0.1. The thermal expansion coefficients (TEC) of PSCFS were observed to generally decrease with increasing x especially at lower temperature range of 50-600 degrees C. In addition, the AC impedance revealed better electrochemical performance of PSCFS cathode as x <= 0.1 than that of the undoped sample PSCF. Therefore, PSCFSx (x <= 0.1) shows some potential as cathode electrode for IT-SOFC. The function of Sc3+ dopant was tentatively elucidated and discussed. Copyright (C) 2010, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据