4.1 Article

Biomass Yield Efficiency of the Marine Anammox Bacterium, Candidatus Scalindua sp., is Affected by Salinity

期刊

MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 86-91

出版社

JAPANESE SOC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, DEPT BIORESOURCE SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14088

关键词

anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox); Candidatus Scalindua; biomass yield efficiency; salinity; volatile fatty acids

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellows
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23241029] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth rate and biomass yield efficiency of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria are markedly lower than those of most other autotrophic bacteria. Among the anammox bacterial genera, the growth rate and biomass yield of the marine anammox bacterium Candidatus Scalindua sp. is still lower than those of other anammox bacteria enriched from freshwater environments. The activity and growth of marine anammox bacteria are generally considered to be affected by the presence of salinity and organic compounds. Therefore, in the present study, the effects of salinity and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) on the anammox activity, inorganic carbon uptake, and biomass yield efficiency of Candidatus Scalindua sp. enriched from the marine sediments of Hiroshima Bay, Japan, were investigated in batch experiments. Differences in VFA concentrations (0-10 mM) were observed under varying salinities (0.5%-4%). Anammox activity was high at 0.5%-3.5% salinity, but was 30% lower at 4% salinity. In addition, carbon uptake was higher at 1.5%-3.5% salinity. The results of the present study clearly demonstrated that the biomass yield efficiency of the marine anammox bacterium Candidatus Scalindua sp. was significantly affected by salinity. On the other hand, the presence of VFAs up to 10 mM did not affect anammox activity, carbon uptake, or biomass yield efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据