4.6 Article

Simulating urban growth boundaries using a patch-based cellular automaton with economic and ecological constraints

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1514119

关键词

Urban growth boundary; SA-Patch-CA; AgentLA; ecological protection areas; scenario simulations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501450, 41601420, 41871306]
  2. Key National Natural Science Foundation of China [41531176]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [16lgpy03]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0604402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban growth boundaries (UGBs) have been applied in many rapid urbanizing areas to alleviate the problems of urban sprawl. Although empirical research has stressed the importance of ecological protection in UGB delineation, existing UGB models lack a component for the assessment of ecologically sensitive areas. To address this problem, we develop an innovative method that is capable of simulating UGB alternatives with economic and ecological constraints. Our method employs a patch-based cellular automaton (i.e. SA-Patch-CA) for simulating future urban growth, constrained by the ecological protection areas produced by an agent-based land allocation optimization model (AgentLA). The delineation of UGBs is also based on the estimated future urban land demand derived from support vector regression (SVR). The proposed method is applied in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China. Three scenarios are designed to represent different objectives of future industrial transitions. The results indicate that increasing the shares of low energy consumption industries and tertiary industries can effectively reduce urban land demand. By overlapping the simulations, we found that the areal agreement of the simulated UGBs among the three scenarios accounts for approximately 88% of the total area. These areas can then be considered as the primary locations for establishing the UGBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据