4.4 Article

A Longitudinal Test of Impulsivity and Depression Pathways to Early Binge Eating Onset

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 230-237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22277

关键词

risk; development; personality; youth; binge eating

资金

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) [R01 AA 016166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe very early engagement in bulimic behaviors, such as binge eating, may be influenced by factors that dispose individuals to impulsive action as well as by factors that dispose individuals to depressive symptomatology. Using a longitudinal design, we conducted the first test of the simultaneous operation of both risk factors as children transition from elementary to middle school. MethodIn a sample of 1,906 children, we assessed risk for impulsive action (negative urgency, which is the tendency to act rashly when distressed, and eating expectancies, which are learned anticipations that eating will alleviate negative mood) and risk for depression (negative affect and depressive symptomatology) and binge eating behavior at three time points using a longitudinal design: the end of fifth grade (last year of elementary school: T0), the beginning of sixth grade (first year of middle school: T1), and the end of sixth grade (T2). ResultsBoth the impulsive action and depression pathways predicted very early engagement in binge eating: each accounted for variance beyond the other. Mediation tests found that T1 eating expectancies mediated the predictive influence of T0 negative urgency on T2 binge eating (z=2.45, p<.01) and that T1 depressive symptoms mediated the influence of T0 negative affect on T2 binge eating (z=2.04, p<.05). DiscussionIn children, elevated levels of both negative urgency and negative affect predict early binge eating. This finding has important clinical implications because there are different interventions for the two different risk processes. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:230-237)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据