4.4 Article

Treating eating disorders over the internet: A systematic review and future research directions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 539-552

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22135

关键词

review; internet; eating disorders; treatment; outcome; predictors; compliance; cognitive behavioural therapy

资金

  1. European Commission's Executive Agency for Health and Consumers in the Health Programme [20101209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review the literature regarding internet-based treatment of eating disorders (ED). Method: Relevant studies were identified by searching electronic databases (including Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science). Eligible studies evaluated an internet-based treatment for ED, or an ED treatment that included at least one internet-based component. Results: Twenty-one studies were included. Methodological quality varied. Internet-based treatments were superior to waiting lists in reducing ED psychopathology, frequency of binge eating and purging, and in improving (ED-related) quality of life. Internet-based treatment was more effective for individuals with less comorbid psychopathology, binge eating as opposed to restrictive problems, and individuals with binge eating disorder as opposed to bulimia nervosa. Higher levels of compliance were related to more improvements in ED symptoms. Study dropout ranged from 5.3 to 76.8%. Inclusion of face-to-face assessments and therapist support seemed to enhance study compliance. Overall, the internet can be considered an acceptable vehicle for delivering ED treatment. Discussion: Future research should determine the utility of internet-based treatment by comparing them to face-to-face treatment. Research should furthermore focus on unraveling predictors and mediators of treatment outcome, compliance, and dropout, respectively. Studies with good methodological quality are needed with reports according to CONSORT guidelines. (c) 2013 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2013; 46:539-552)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据