4.4 Article

Attitudes Toward Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Results from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 394-401

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20632

关键词

gestational weight gain; anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; binge eating disorder

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HD047186]
  2. NIH/NIEHS [N01-ES-85433]
  3. NIH/NINDS [1 U01 NS 047537-01]
  4. Norwegian Research Council/FUGE [151918/S10]
  5. Norwegian Ministry of Health
  6. American Psychiatric Institute of Research and Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore attitudes toward weight gain during pregnancy in women with and without eating disorders and across eating disorder subtypes, and to examine associations among weight-gain attitudes and actual gestational weight gain, infant birth weight, and infant size-for-gestational-age. Method: Pregnant women (35,929) enrolled in the prospective population-based Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa) provided information at approximately week 18 of gestation regarding eating disorders and weight gain attitudes. We explored these variables in women with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorder not otherwise specified, purging type, and binge eating disorder (BED). Results: The presence of an eating disorderly was associated with greater worry over gestational weight gain. In women without eating disorders, greater worry was associated with higher gestational weight gain, higher infant weights, greater likelihood of a large-for-gestational-age infant, and reduced likelihood of a small-for-gestational-age infant. Women with BED who reported greater worry also experienced higher weight gains during pregnancy. Discussion: Women with eating disorders tend to experience weight-gain-related worry during pregnancy. Early worry about gestational weight-gain may be a harbinger of high gestational gain. (C) 2008 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据