4.1 Review

Mapping connectivity in the developing brain

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.05.007

关键词

Development; Brain connectivity; DTI; HARDI; rs-fMRI; Autism; ADHD; Fragile X; 22q11.2 DS; Turner syndrome; Williams syndrome

资金

  1. NIH Training Grant in Neurobehavioral Genetics [T32MH073526-06]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01 HD050735]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia [NHMRC 486682, 1009064]
  4. NIH R01 [EB008432, EB008281, EB007813, P41 RR013642]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there has been a wealth of research into structural and functional brain connectivity, and how they change over development. While we are far from a complete understanding, these studies have yielded important insights into human brain development. There is an ever growing variety of methods for assessing connectivity, each with its own advantages. Here we review research on the development of structural and/or functional brain connectivity in both typically developing subjects and subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders. Space limitations preclude an exhaustive review of brain connectivity across all developmental disorders, so we review a representative selection of recent findings on brain connectivity in autism, Fragile X, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Williams syndrome; Turner syndrome, and ADHD. Major strides have been made in understanding the developmental trajectory of the human connectome, offering insight into characteristic features of brain development and biological processes involved in developmental brain disorders. We also discuss some common themes, including hemispheric specialization - or asymmetry - and sex differences. We conclude by discussing some promising future directions in connectomics, including the merger of imaging and genetics, and a deeper investigation of the relationships between structural and functional connectivity. (C) 2013 ISDN. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据